It's strange to me that when discussing Thick As A Brick, it's always mentioned that it was intended to be something of a spoof of prog rock, stretching all the tropes of the genre to ridiculous heights. The fact that it became a classic of the genre in its own right speaks to how incredibly talented Ian Anderson is.
But what I find strange is that almost nobody discusses its follow up, A Passion Play, in the same terms. It seems incredibly unlikely that it was ALSO intended to be a satire, even though the formula makes comparisons inevitable (one album-length conceptual song split into two parts, released immediately afterward). And also, it seems largely forgotten or generally disliked, but that might just be because it is so closely tied with its superior predecessor.
So I'd just like to hear some opinions on this album, because honestly I enjoy it almost as much as Thick As A Brick, and Part 1 is essentially flawless from start to finish. I like the greater emphasis on brass instrumentation, the whole piece feels more jazz-influenced than TAAB. Also, while the lyrics aren't as poetically ornate, they do succeed in telling a much more concise story. Also, having Jeffrey Hammond take on a fairly large vocal role on the wonderfully random introduction of the second half is enough to set the piece apart from most of Tull's catalog ( plus who could forget his immortal "and your little sister's immaculate virginity wings away on the bony shoulders of a young horse named George!").
It's not perfect, there are definitely some moments on the second half where it feels a bit drawn out for its own sake, and the end is really quite anticlimactic. Still, for being what I imagine was a more genuine attempt to play in this style than its predecessor, I think it's a wonderfully enjoyable album, one that deserves some re-evaluation from critics.